home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.jhu.edu!robodude
- From: robodude@deanwong.rad.jhu.edu (Zsolt Szabo)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.be
- Subject: Re: 1995 Production Status?
- Date: 24 Jan 1996 06:15:53 GMT
- Organization: The Dungeon
- Message-ID: <4e4iqp$7bd@news.jhu.edu>
- References: <4de07p$bbo@bandit.cyberwar.com> <4dk1mb$e97@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <4dp18h$1uq@murphy.servtech.com> <mipsyssw-2301961619070001@cyber55.imaginet.fr>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.220.158.43
-
- In article <mipsyssw-2301961619070001@cyber55.imaginet.fr>,
- Raphael MOLL <mipsyssw@platina.fr> wrote:
-
- >I still can't believe that this will be so easy...
- >How can the CHRP specifications be so well-designed that any OS will find
- >the way to use the chips of a CHRP platform ?
- >Does CHRP means that there can't be ANY custom, specialized chip on the board ?
- >
-
-
- No. After all, the C64 emulator doesn't restrict the Amiga to 16 colors.
- That is, to be CHRP compliant does not necessarily mean you have to give
- up on certain features that you can internally support.
-
-
- --
- __
- -/_)_ ( _ __) __)__
- _/ \(_)_)_)_/(_/_/(-________________________________________________________
-